fnord wrote:

This is such a fucked up prude country!  I really prefer the French attitude of politely ignoring sexual activity or fetishes you don’t wish to participate in.  The magazine kiosks on the street display porn alongside the rest of the magazines; you buy it or not, it’s no big deal.  The TV has shows that leave little to the imagination; you use the remote if you don’t want to see people having sex.  At night, the parks are full of men and women sucking dicks; everyone else stays away or minds their own business if they take a shortcut through the park.  Only a very few emotionally disturbed people call for censorship or want the authorities to harass people who don’t lead vanilla lives.  I wish Americans could grow up and learn to mind their own business.

Well said, sir.

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

What can you expect? America was founded on Europe's effluent. Fred Phelps and all his friends got off the boat at Plymouth Rock. Those huddled masses? Superstitious peasants and the righteously insane.

What ever happened to Bill Vander Zalm, anyway?

fnord wrote:

This is such a fucked up prude country!  I really prefer the French attitude of politely ignoring sexual activity or fetishes you don’t wish to participate in.  The magazine kiosks on the street display porn alongside the rest of the magazines; you buy it or not, it’s no big deal.  The TV has shows that leave little to the imagination; you use the remote if you don’t want to see people having sex.  At night, the parks are full of men and women sucking dicks; everyone else stays away or minds their own business if they take a shortcut through the park.  Only a very few emotionally disturbed people call for censorship or want the authorities to harass people who don’t lead vanilla lives.  I wish Americans could grow up and learn to mind their own business.

fnord is High Street's finest example of how we should not discriminate against others just because they are different....

I guess white women with black guys don't bug me that much cause the white women that like black guys are so fuckin' ugly no self respectin' white guy would be seen with them... I think it's nice that they're gettin' some lovin' from somewhere at least....

Last edited by Dirckman (2008-06-28 21:45:52)

Figured I might as well try to start another shit storm in here...  This place gets kinda boring with its uber liberal P.C. bullshit...

George Orr wrote:

orangeplus wrote:

Dirckman wrote:

I guess white women with black guys don't bug me that much cause the white women that like black guys are so fuckin' ugly no self respectin' white guy would be seen with them... I think it's nice that they're gettin' some lovin' from somewhere at least....

You make Fnord look enlightened

I have to admit, most of the time when I see a white gal with a black boyfriend, she'll be a mighty mighty big girl.  Not just typical-American-overweight big, either; more like...spherical. 
And blonde.  If she's not a natural blonde she's usually dyed her hair.
I always figured it was a cultural thing and, like Dirckman, thought it was nice that spherical ladies can occasionally get laid, too.

Baby got back.

I find the same thing.  With the sole exception of Heidi Klum, of course.

Thanks George!!  I couldn't describe that type of lady better than you did!!  Apparently it's the same thing all over the U.S....  I'm wondering if it's the same thing internationally too...  Could we get some feedback from our British brothern?

George Orr wrote:

I have to admit, most of the time when I see a white gal with a black boyfriend, she'll be a mighty mighty big girl.  Not just typical-American-overweight big, either; more like...spherical. 
And blonde.  If she's not a natural blonde she's usually dyed her hair.
I always figured it was a cultural thing and, like Dirckman, thought it was nice that spherical ladies can occasionally get laid, too.

Last edited by jesusluvspegging (2008-06-29 01:24:41)

I don't consider Will Smith to be "black"...  There's quite a few people out there I don't consider black and I just consider them to be a "dude" like you or me...  With these people I don't get that little xenophobic twinge at all...  I think I'm willing to accept black people if they don't define themselves by their color and define themselves just by being themselves..  I tend to notice this the most when watching TV..  There will be a black person on the tube and if they talk and dress like a black person I feel a certain level of animosity towards them, but if they dress and talk normal I tend to respect and value their opinion just like I would a white fellas...  I don't know if this makes me sound good or bad, but at least I'm being honest...

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

I don't know if this makes me sound good or bad, but at least I'm being honest...

Do you honestly care how it makes you sound? Besides, you're rather equal opportunity. You barely give anyone a chance to demonstrate intelligence, and those who do, you act as if it's just a façade and attack them anyway.

Me thinks Pale didn't miss much... You misinterpreted my approach Mr. Cuntlicker...  I was simply pondering my own thoughts, no matter how irrational, based upon a behavioristic model...  You treated what I felt was a very intellectually honest observation that I made about myself as a human in a very short sighted fashion..  You're very much like an evangelical I dated awhile back who kept telling me that all I had to do was stop being an atheist and believe in the New Testament god....  For further proof simply read my statements once more and you'll see that they're written in the fashion of the super-ego contemplating the irrational drives of the id....

pALEPHx wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

I don't know if this makes me sound good or bad, but at least I'm being honest...

Do you honestly care how it makes you sound? Besides, you're rather equal opportunity. You barely give anyone a chance to demonstrate intelligence, and those who do, you act as if it's just a façade and attack them anyway.

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

I don't know if this makes me sound good or bad, but at least I'm being honest...

Do you honestly care how it makes you sound? Besides, you're rather equal opportunity. You barely give anyone a chance to demonstrate intelligence, and those who do, you act as if it's just a façade and attack them anyway.

Hmmm...methinks you missed something....

And now that you've gone back and read the whole post, and not just the bottom half (and I do mean half), I will address your question as though it were contextually relevant.
1. I am usually in control of how I sound. Controlling the sound of words is what I do. It would certainly work against my interest were I  not to care about what I do, would it not? (I chose to end that phrase with a conditional, to keep you, dear pENIx, feeling warm and involved).
2. What does it mean to "barely give anyone a chance to demonstrate intelligence"? Are you saying that the denizens of High-Street are so shy and bashful they can't get a word in around me? Or just that they're stupid? Either way, I take issue with such a presumptuously inclusive hyperbole. I play with the kids on High-Street because they tend to be smart (with the occasional exception), outspoken, and ready to go toe-to-toe. If i wanted to worry about people's feelings, I'd hang out with the equally intelligent, but possibly less robust souls at Chimere.
3. I attack slack thinking, sometimes viciously, but I do not prey indiscriminately. There are people here who are afflicted with terrible language skills, or with a congenital mediocrity of thought. I accept one or the other, but both in the same phrase-limned silhouette can only indicate one thing: ungulate (if male) or ruminant (if not. In the electronically unassisted portion of my life I live off leaves, but here, on that great (grey-green greasy) cattle-grazing ground we know as High-Street.Org(y), occasionally I nip at a heel, lunge at a jugular, pull down a moon-calf and sate my thirst for blood. It's nothing personal. Hell, sometimes I even feel bad about it. But none of that matters, because a carnivore needs his viands.
4. To end this sorry reprimand, I'd like to say that it's charming and even manly of you to beetle to Dirckman's defense, but I'm not sure it will bring you any satisfying gains. Dirckman appears to be heterosexual, and besides, he's not an idiot - he clearly has an advanced degree in Psychology. He can defend himself, or choose not to, or even realize that the initial commentary was conveyed through the medium of imitative jest, blowing warm and cool in concert, like Miles in Sketches of Spain.

Last edited by WilberCuntLicker (2008-07-01 17:41:03)

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

[self-aggrandizing prattle]

If you're feeling the need to defend yourself, then you can obviously perceive how you might have said something a bit wrong. Dirckman doesn't need my defense, but he also doesn't need your ivory belltower shooting at whoever happens to catch your ire ("See the people down their in online land, they look like ants!"). You don't know anybody, but you'll make your mostly arbitrary decisions about who's worth sparring with, while the rest of us wonder who you're going to nominate for abuse, next. Having been the direct recipient of your rainbows and sunbeams, I feel confident in my observation, and you needn't defend against it. Either it's just the way you are, and the rest of the world has to change to suit you, or you're outrageously bored, and your mixed-use guttersniping/high dudgeon is exclusively for your own amusement.

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Your moral force is zero, and you have FAIL on your face.

What are you, 19? I think I'll just have to speak in a language you understand...

Oh, he's definitely smarter than a 5th grader. I'll give him that. It's exactly the sort of wasted intelligence I used to display before I figured out how not to treat people in a forum environment. I keep getting baited back into these old ways, and should probably inscribe my monitor with "This Turns OFF." Perhaps he takes the Cruel/HS credo a bit too seriously. WTFK. If I thought it would improve membership, increase activity, I'd let everyone call me "Phale Penix" just fer larfs. Short of that, however, he's just missing Lurker and Princess Biscuit's last, worst vid entry.

Dirckman wrote:

Ya know Pale, dealing with Wilber gives me bad flashbacks to the third grade.......  I think he's from Canada, that probably explains most of it...

Muffin - have I bruised your ego? I don't know why. You play dumb all the time - it's a mainstay of your on-line persona. I just mirrored it back to you. Must I suffer persecution for what only amounts to a light-hearted tease? I'm beginning to think that you're not nearly as amiable as you pretend to be...in fact...I suspect, given the vitriol you're inexplicably heaping on me (to my confusion and sadness), that you're some kind of gay nazi.


Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

pALEPHx wrote:

I feel confident speaking for both Dirckman and I on this one: Yawn. Stop it.

He's much savvier than I am when it comes to this sorta shit. So are most of the HS Irregulars, for that matter. If you think you're dunning me into submission, then you're wasting your time. Just calm the fuck down. I don't hate you. Yet.

Yeah, yeah - he who resorts to a [i]yawn[/] first loses. That's something Lurker does.
As for dunning you into submission - you started this with your chivalric defence of poor muffin. If you want out, you back out. Half of everything you say is about other people, anyways. Possibly you have little mind of your own.

tojo2000 wrote:

I was just kind of scanning this thread until I saw the Group Hug image and figured I'd missed some drama.  Imagine my surprise when I discovered that Wilbur had somehow gotten his feelings hurt.  As I was wading through the fallout I had an epiphany.

I finally understand what makes Wilbur tick.  The Chinese puzzle box of artifice and word-trickery that makes up the CuntLicker has finally been opened.   

You see, he's not Canadian, he's "Canadian".

Would that be in the same way that you're "Japanese"?

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Link to YouTube page

Ahh... Wilber... displaying some real taste there with Rodrigo's "Orange Juice".  But as good as Miles is, this is still my fav version, from the movie "Brassed Off!". 

BTW, if any of you haven't seen Brassed Off!, GO AND RENT IT NOW.  The music alone will raise the little hairs on the back of your neck, and the story and acting are superb.  It's a hidden jem.  Plus, the cute little levochka ain't bad on the eyes, either.

Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-07-01 12:25:49)

I rarely cry at movies, but the scenes with the speech near the end of the movie, and the other one with the playing of Danny Boy, they do it every time...

Phil: [as Mr. Chuckles] "So God was creating man. And his little assistant came up to him and he said: "Hey, we've got all these bodies left, but we're right out of brains, we're right out of hearts and we're right out of vocal chords." And God said: "Fuck it! Sew 'em up anyway. Smack smiles on the faces and make them talk out of their arses." And lo, God created the Tory Party. ... What's He doing? He can take John Lennon. He can take those three young lads down at Ainsley Pit. He's even thinking of taking my old man. And Margaret bloody Thatcher lives! What's He sodding playing at, eh?"

Really, people. WATCH THIS FILM.  If you don't you'll regret it. Maybe not today. Maybe not tomorrow, but soon and for the rest of your life.   (OK, so that's over the top, but really - this one ranks up there with Harold & Maude as one of my all-time best-of-the-best.)

Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-07-01 13:11:02)

pALEPHx wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

And also Whosat, yes - as you request, I promise not to use the ;autoplay=0 anymore. Hee hee.

Then when it's deleted for you, leave it that way. "I'm certainly not one of your tame faggots?" Alrighty, then.

You certainly are bitchy, pENIx. In related news, you've lost your jauntiness, and replaced it with petulance. Your style has become leaden, and your logic has lost clarity. And since when did you start issuing imperatives? Look to your welfare, pENIx old friend - you're not yourself these days.

Okay, if you guys don't quit it this entire thread will have to be reposted to the Cat Recipes thread.

Meow.

whosasailorthen wrote:

Wilbert, turn of the damned autoplay again, will ya?  You don't have to do it for Pale.  Do it for me, please?  Presumably I haven't pissed you off, have I?

No you haven't pissed me off, whosat. Our little anal buddy took it upon himself which created some intransigence, but since you ask so nicely.