#1 2008-07-07 12:05:58

In 1969, a 14-year-old Beatle fanatic named Jerry Levitan, armed with a reel-to-reel tape deck, snuck into John Lennon’s hotel room in Toronto and convinced John to do an interview about peace. 38 years later, Jerry has produced a film about it.



Offline

 

#2 2008-07-07 14:36:57

I think John would have liked that film very much. 

Thanks for that... very good indeed... it's a keeper.

OH, and BTW, Canada = NOTHING.  From the mouth of a Canadian.   How profound.

Offline

 

#3 2008-07-07 15:29:57

whosasailorthen wrote:

I think John would have liked that film very much. 

Thanks for that... very good indeed... it's a keeper.

OH, and BTW, Canada = NOTHING.  From the mouth of a Canadian.   How profound.

Whosat, you impress me less and less as the days go by. Find yourself a first year English text book and study the concept of IRONY for a few years till you get it. Until then, shut up - you're embarrassing yourself (or you would be if you had the sense to realize it).

Offline

 

#5 2008-07-07 15:45:04

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

whosasailorthen wrote:

I think John would have liked that film very much. 

Thanks for that... very good indeed... it's a keeper.

OH, and BTW, Canada = NOTHING.  From the mouth of a Canadian.   How profound.

Whosat, you impress me less and less as the days go by. Find yourself a first year English text book and study the concept of IRONY for a few years till you get it. Until then, shut up - you're embarrassing yourself (or you would be if you had the sense to realize it).

Wilber, sweetie, I think you should lighten up.

Whenever someone here declares Vegas a meth-infested shithole, I just laugh my ass off. It may or may not be true, but it's just an opinion, and I enjoy living here.

I happen to like Canada and Canadians. You have much to feel pride about, with regards to the country you live in.

Last edited by sofaking (2008-07-07 15:46:18)

Offline

 

#6 2008-07-07 16:02:48

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

whosasailorthen wrote:

I think John would have liked that film very much. 

Thanks for that... very good indeed... it's a keeper.

OH, and BTW, Canada = NOTHING.  From the mouth of a Canadian.   How profound.

Whosat, you impress me less and less as the days go by. Find yourself a first year English text book and study the concept of IRONY for a few years till you get it. Until then, shut up - you're embarrassing yourself (or you would be if you had the sense to realize it).

Wow.  I actually impressed you at one time, Wilbie?  Gee.  I really don't know what to say.  I'm... I'm...  verklempt.

(Ahh, I knew you'd bite hard on that one... *sigh*... the problem is, you're just too easy - it's like fishing in an over-stocked pond.)

Offline

 

#7 2008-07-07 16:08:40

whosasailorthen wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

whosasailorthen wrote:

I think John would have liked that film very much. 

Thanks for that... very good indeed... it's a keeper.

OH, and BTW, Canada = NOTHING.  From the mouth of a Canadian.   How profound.

Whosat, you impress me less and less as the days go by. Find yourself a first year English text book and study the concept of IRONY for a few years till you get it. Until then, shut up - you're embarrassing yourself (or you would be if you had the sense to realize it).

Wow.  I actually impressed you at one time, Wilbie?  Gee.  I really don't know what to say.  I'm... I'm...  verklempt.

(Ahh, I knew you'd bite hard on that one... *sigh*... the problem is, you're just too easy - it's like fishing in an over-stocked pond.)

Yeah yeah - nice try. But it's too late to recover from your astounding display of stupidity. You're becoming the new Lurker, Whosat. You talk much and say little, and what you say reeks of intellectual vapidity.

Offline

 

#8 2008-07-07 16:55:29

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Yeah yeah - nice try. But it's too late to recover from your astounding display of stupidity. You're becoming the new Lurker, Whosat. You talk much and say little, and what you say reeks of intellectual vapidity.

Who died and left you king of the molehill? You're the new Lurker. AHAHAHAHAHA...

Offline

 

#9 2008-07-07 17:13:21

pALEPHx wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Yeah yeah - nice try. But it's too late to recover from your astounding display of stupidity. You're becoming the new Lurker, Whosat. You talk much and say little, and what you say reeks of intellectual vapidity.

Who died and left you king of the molehill? You're the new Lurker. AHAHAHAHAHA...

An amusing thought. But I'd have to stretch out my ass and stick my head in a microwave oven first. And anyways - you should talk - you're the OLD Lurker. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Offline

 

#10 2008-07-07 17:17:28

What does the score card say?

Offline

 

#11 2008-07-07 17:19:51

I have Wilber up by 2

Offline

 

#12 2008-07-07 17:39:22

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

And anyways - you should talk - you're the OLD Lurker.

Fine. You can be the new Horse. 'Ho, Canadaaaa...

Offline

 

#13 2008-07-07 20:07:56

No I could never aspire to such dizzying heights. I'm too...three-dimensional. And I can write with different voices...in various styles. I was hoping I could be the new Princess Biscuit, but apparently she's still around....

Offline

 

#14 2008-07-07 20:20:59

I go to work and come back to the usual Bitch Fight.  Girls, kiss and make up.

Offline

 

#15 2008-07-07 20:35:58

I always like watching new bitches in the harem mix it up.

Offline

 

#16 2008-07-07 21:41:38

Dmtdust wrote:

I go to work and come back to the usual Bitch Fight.

Please. We're so used to doing that, by now, it should have half the calories of your usual bitchfight and twice the sugar substitute. And I'm not kissing him. Go Rule 34 Sofie and O+ or somethin'.

Offline

 

#17 2008-07-07 21:58:31

pALEPHx wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

I go to work and come back to the usual Bitch Fight.

Go Rule 34 Sofie and O+ or somethin'.

What does that mean?

Is it a verb now?

Offline

 

#18 2008-07-07 22:08:13

sofaking wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

I go to work and come back to the usual Bitch Fight.

Go Rule 34 Sofie and O+ or somethin'.

What does that mean?

Is it a verb now?

No, it is a pronoun. Rule 34 is the verb.

Offline

 

#19 2008-07-07 22:19:12

I am Spartacus!

No, I am Spartacus!

Offline

 

#20 2008-07-07 22:19:31

opsec wrote:

I always like watching new bitches in the harem mix it up.

Effeminating, ensqualming and adipocapotic metaphors will be dis-remembered retro-futuristically.

Offline

 

#21 2008-07-08 11:55:43

Wilber by 3

http://shamshield.com/sofakingOp34.png

Last edited by orangeplus (2008-07-08 12:10:30)

Offline

 

#22 2008-07-08 12:28:28

pALEPHx wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Yeah yeah - nice try. But it's too late to recover from your astounding display of stupidity. You're becoming the new Lurker, Whosat. You talk much and say little, and what you say reeks of intellectual vapidity.

Who died and left you king of the molehill? You're the new Lurker. AHAHAHAHAHA...

Thanks for the assist, Pale, but I was enjoying playing with Wilber... he's not really a Lurker though... he's more like a cat toy.

Offline

 

#23 2008-07-08 13:19:17

whosasailorthen wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Yeah yeah - nice try. But it's too late to recover from your astounding display of stupidity. You're becoming the new Lurker, Whosat. You talk much and say little, and what you say reeks of intellectual vapidity.

Who died and left you king of the molehill? You're the new Lurker. AHAHAHAHAHA...

Thanks for the assist, Pale, but I was enjoying playing with Wilber... he's not really a Lurker though... he's more like a cat toy.

A little too late, Whosat, we've moved on.

Offline

 

#24 2008-07-08 15:05:32

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

whosasailorthen wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:


Who died and left you king of the molehill? You're the new Lurker. AHAHAHAHAHA...

Thanks for the assist, Pale, but I was enjoying playing with Wilber... he's not really a Lurker though... he's more like a cat toy.

A little too late, Whosat, we've moved on.

Sorry, Wilbie.  I don't live here.

Offline

 

#25 2008-07-08 16:21:29

whosasailorthen wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

whosasailorthen wrote:


Thanks for the assist, Pale, but I was enjoying playing with Wilber... he's not really a Lurker though... he's more like a cat toy.

A little too late, Whosat, we've moved on.

Sorry, Wilbie.  I don't live here.

Neither do I, Whosat. It's not an issue of habitation, it's a matter of judgement. My grandmother would also have mentioned breeding, but I'm above such trifling snobbery.

Offline

 

#26 2008-07-08 16:42:18

Wilber deducted 1 point for needless hypocrisy.

Trifling - If you are an HS regular, you are a trifling motherfucker by definition.

Offline

 

#27 2008-07-09 12:44:27

orangeplus wrote:

Wilber deducted 1 point for needless hypocrisy.

Trifling - If you are an HS regular, you are a trifling motherfucker by definition.

Thank you OrangePlus. I embrace the deduction with abject humility. I certainly will not cavil at your wise and just decision.
...
...
...
The thing is, though...
In my view, which, admittedly, falls several furlongs short of omniscience, hypocrisy is a necessary substrate to rational discourse...and perhaps, more basically, to existence. We are all hypokrinesthai, each of us "...a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage...." Stage right (birth) - stage left - (death): these are the only true directions, the blocking we must manage on our own, and our lines, without a proper script, are delivered ex tempore. Though there are those (listed below) who would have us suspend disbelief, it's a certainty that we all live within hierarchies of ignorance, pretense, presumption and falsity; hypocrisy is not an enemy, or a thing to be reviled, but a universal constant and a corollary to life. Had Planck not stolen it, I would assign hypocrisy the letter h for its ease of use in formulae. Moral zealots, religious fanatics, cops, guards, bosses, park wardens, politicians, social workers, sign-makers, and hemulens of every shape, colour and size; these are the only hypocrites that deserve the name, for they attempt to deny their own hypocrisy. I do not. I am aware of h (both mine and Planck's) and I am comfortable with it. I wear it like an old familiar pair of boxer briefs with a comfortable bulge in the front to accommodate my large appurtenances. To this degree, I believe it to be trifling to penalize me for trifling over trifling.

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com