It is a known fact that lesbian populations grow exponentially, while gay male populations do so linearly. This is why the two don't get along.

George Orr wrote:

ah297900 wrote:

It is a known fact that lesbian populations grow exponentially, while gay male populations do so linearly. This is why the two don't get along.

There's a flaw in your logic.  Statistically, 51% of lesbians' offspring are male and therefore cannot become lesbians.  (I think most of the dykes throw the boy babies away, don't they?)

No, the boys eventually go on to have sex-change operations and become lesbians themselves.

By the way, a google image search for "bulldyke" returned that poor woman's picture 6 times on the first page. A google image search for "twink" means I have to delete my cache.

Few things are as intimidating as the whithering glances of a teenaged girl or a twink. I'll pass on both, thank you.

fnord wrote:

ah297900 wrote:

It is a known fact that lesbian populations grow exponentially, while gay male populations do so linearly. This is why the two don't get along.

If that’s the case, why are gay men far more common than lesbians?

Because eventually every lesbian has to come to terms with the fact that they were created by God as bisexual toys for men.

So, at least around Atlanta, the new "in" haircut for dykes is the mullet-mohawk.

I have real trouble not laughing my ass off when I see this haircut on a lizzie in a wifebeater.

And the whole girl on girl thing, speaking from direct experience, was waaaayyyy too squishy and vague. I need to see some kind of physical, tangible by product of my  sexual efforts on my partner, not just some sticky stuff that could pass as a snail trail.
I think I am a gay man trapped in a woman's body.

Taint wrote:

Toe, I think you're confusing "twinks" with "gays". Twinks are a sub-set of gaydom, known for their youth, obsession with celebrity, poor taste, and their general lack of sophistication or intellect, which makes them very popular with other sub-sets of gay men, notably those who are older and more devious. Twinks have little patience for anyone over, say, 28 or anyone who is unfamiliar with [insert name of current pop diva or other celebrity here] or any adult male who hasn't any money. To be fair, twinks, while vapid and about as profound as hair gel, do perform several useful functions: they work the tedious retail jobs that no one with an IQ over 82 could stand to do; they're useful as fill for large crowds because they have to be everywhere anything is happening and; they're generally pretty good at remembering song lyrics, provided you're looking for the lyrics of songs performed by singers whose work is appreciated by twinks.

And, if I may poach on your territory, twinks also tend to be unusually skinny yet without any muscle tone, and prefer bright, solid colors (verging on neon).

I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that twinks, by definition are unable to defend themselves effectively--to do so would be an abrogation of their whole style. Think Shelley Duvall in The Shining, specifically her swinging the bat at Nicholson.

Before teh Wrath descends on me, I need to say that this is not a value judgment against twinks, merely a description.

Last edited by ah297900 (2008-07-30 16:44:51)

I'm starting to wonder if these "twinks" may be the responsible party for introducing the fad of combining celeb/celeb relationships into one hybrid name. It took an EX-tremely gay fuck to come up with "Bennifer."  I will forever hate them for this plague if they are the root cause {ha} of this.

choad wrote:

icangetyouatoe wrote:

And the whole girl on girl thing, speaking from direct experience, was waaaayyyy too squishy and vague.

No physical or emotional friction?

Do lesbians really "scissor" in the wild? 

Why am I asking you people?

Speaking of Uber-Twinks...

Something about cunnilingus brings out this desire to wear a rugby shirt, I'm not sure what it is, so I'm staying away.

ah297900 wrote:

And, if I may poach on your territory, twinks also tend to be unusually skinny yet without any muscle tone, and prefer bright, solid colors (verging on neon).

I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that twinks, by definition are unable to defend themselves effectively--to do so would be an abrogation of their whole style. Think Shelley Duvall in The Shining, specifically her swinging the bat at Nicholson.

Before teh Wrath descends on me, I need to say that this is not a value judgment against twinks, merely a description.

Very good,  Ah Poo. Did you say you were an anthropologist?

fnord wrote:

ah297900 wrote:

It is a known fact that lesbian populations grow exponentially, while gay male populations do so linearly. This is why the two don't get along.

If that’s the case, why are gay men far more common than lesbians?

Pick a definition:

1.
  a. Belonging equally to or shared equally by two or more; joint: common interests.
  b. Of or relating to the community as a whole; public: for the common good. See Usage Note at mutual.
2. Widespread; prevalent.
3.
  a. Occurring frequently or habitually; usual.
  b. Most widely known; ordinary: the common housefly.
4. Having no special designation, status, or rank: a common sailor.
5.
  a. Not distinguished by superior or noteworthy characteristics; average: the common spectator.
  b. Of no special quality; standard: common procedure.
  c. Of mediocre or inferior quality; second-rate: common cloth.
6. Unrefined or coarse in manner; vulgar: behavior that branded him as common.

pALEPHx wrote:

sigmoid freud wrote:

6. Unrefined or coarse in manner; vulgar: behavior that branded him as common.

"Twink."

Of course "Chav" fits equally as well. There is something in the Ying and Yang in the Twink and the Chav. Both are effeminate, pasty and dress to sear the retinas. The primary difference is that Chavs band together to beat up Twinks and Twinks get together to blow Chavs in the loo at posh clubs.

There's a sociology thesis in there somewhere...

Twink?

But.... it has a caption of twink...

GooberMcNutly wrote:

There's a sociology thesis in there somewhere...

Yes.

Dmtdust wrote:

Twink?

No.

Dmtdust wrote:

But.... it has a caption of twink...

Maybe so.

Dmtdust wrote:

Or this? http://www.twink.net/

Reply hazy. Try again later.